The Opponent
Identify who filed the opposition and the rights or interests relied upon.
A third party has opposed registration. Understand the opponent’s case, how the application may be defended and the procedure that follows.
A third party has formally objected to registration after the application was accepted for publication. Unlike a Provisional Refusal, this is a contested proceeding between parties.
Identify who filed the opposition and the rights or interests relied upon.
Identify the exact trademark application, its owner and the goods or services challenged.
Identify the specific allegations that the applicant is required to answer.
Record the Counter-Statement deadline immediately. Failure to respond may affect the application.
The defence should be based on the specific grounds, facts and rights relied upon by the opponent.
The opponent may rely on an earlier registered or pending trademark and allege a likelihood of confusion.
The opponent may claim rights through earlier use and allege that registration would adversely affect those rights.
The opponent may allege that the application was filed dishonestly or in circumstances that make the filing improper.
Other statutory grounds may be relied upon depending on the trademark, application and surrounding circumstances.
The proceeding moves through six prescribed stages. Each stage has a specific purpose, filing responsibility and applicable deadline.
The opponent states the grounds on which registration is opposed.
The applicant answers the allegations and confirms the intention to defend.
The opponent files evidence supporting its grounds and claimed rights.
The applicant files evidence supporting the application and responding to the opponent’s case.
The opponent may reply only to matters arising from the applicant’s evidence.
Both parties present their arguments on the pleadings and evidence before the Registrar decides the opposition.
An effective defence begins with the opponent’s allegations, the commercial history of the application and the evidence available to support the applicant’s position.
Consider appearance, pronunciation, meaning and overall impression.
Consider whether they are identical, similar or commercially related and how they reach the market.
Review adoption, first use, continued use and any relevant dealings or relationship between the parties.
Collect dated invoices, catalogues, advertisements, photographs, correspondence and contemporaneous records.
Review the importance and scope of the application and whether a practical resolution should be explored.
After considering the pleadings, evidence and submissions, the Registrar may allow the application to proceed, refuse it, or make another order permitted under the Trade Marks Act.
Consider the reasons, commercial objectives, scope of protection and practicality of further action.
A dissatisfied party may consider an appeal to the High Court. Appeal periods are short and require prompt review.
SPEAK WITH A CONSULTANT
We can review the notice, applicable deadlines, the opponent’s case and the information needed to prepare your response.
Discuss Your Opposition